Hunger Games Lab Analysis

1. In this lab we simulated evolution and natural selection through the process of feeding and reproduction. We had the population split evenly among three different phenotype and had the different groups feed and gain as much cork as possible to simulate feeding. After the birds who gained enough food survived they reproduced and created a second generation which continued the process of feeding and reproduction.
2. Pinchers were the best phenotype at capturing food because they had the use of there oposable thumbs and were allowed to reproduce the most. Contradictory to these results, knucklers continued to reproduce the most and had the largest population due to sexual selection, in which people were more likely to mate with knucklers rather then pinchers despite the data and phenotypic advantages.
3. The population evolved from natural selection because of a change in allele frequency. After the first round, the allele frequency changed greatly in that the A gene dropped in percentage while the a gene rose, showing a change that fit the pattern of phenotypes and how they work in the lab. The percentage of A gene started as 52%, while a gene was at 48%. After the first round, the A gene dropped to 31%, while a gene rose to 69%. After this round, the ratio stated constant and the a gene greatly outnumbered the A gene. This shows how the population evolved quickly and that there was a change in allele frequency.
4. The random events that occurred in this lab were sexual reproduction, the food placement, and the method in which mates were chosen. The non-random events included where people were placed on the line towards the food and phenotype of every bird. These random events had a large effect on the evolution of the population since mating was random and not chosen based upon successful phenotypes, which allowed unsuccessful genotypes to live through sexual reproduction, which slowed evolution of the gene pool. Food placement also affected evolution since individuals closer to food piles survived and gained more food through sheer luck, so natural selection was unable to take place.
5. If the food was larger or smaller, the results would have been different because the different phenotypes would have to adjust to this change, so the data would change based on which phenotype was best suited. If the food became smaller, chances are that the pinchers would be best adapted due to there maneuverability, while stumpys would adjust to larger foods best. This would change the data, as the Stumpys became endangered with the current food size. This is similar to nature in which natural events change the availability of food, so animals must adapt to new foods, which allows the population and gene pool to evolve.
6. If there was no incomplete dominance, the results would be different since knuklers would become stumpys with a higher chance of reproducing, so the population would not evolve due to the stumpys continuously living.
7. Natural selection acts on the phenotypes of individuals, and in turn changes there genotype and decides weather they will survive. This alters the frequency of this genotype in the gene pool, which is evolution, the change of gene frequency in a population.
8. Some strategies that individuals adopted included mating with exclusively pinchers or by having a very aggressive approach to mating. Pinchers had the best equipped phenotype, so only mating with them increased your chance of survival and created offspring that could survive.This relates to nature, where certain individuals only mate with those who have the best traits for survival rather than sexual reproduction, which change the gene frequency and selectively breeds to evolve the population.
9. In evolution, populations evolve, and the frequency of alleles changes. Natural selection acts on the phenotypes, but through acting on the phenotype changes the genotypic frequency for the population.